Could Cannabis Have Stopped Kyle Rittenhouse From Murdering Two Men?

Could Cannabis Have Stopped Kyle Rittenhouse From Murdering Two Men? This is a question being asked on forums and social media sites in the cannabis community.

The Kyle Rittenhouse case has shaken the US and further divided black and white relations amongst US citizens. The Kyle Rittenhouse verdict is mind-blowing to many American citizens who cannot believe the lax gun laws our country has and the many catastrophic instances it has caused over the past few decades.

As the nation stands dumbfounded by the recent murders committed by Kyle Rittenhouse, many in the cannabis community would like to know if he was either stoned, or could have used some weed to calm his nerves. Was he drunk? Did the police check his blood/alcohol level at the time of the shootings?

It is more likely he was drunk than stoned is the general consensus. And if he was drunk, wouldn't that have contributed to his aggressive behavior?

Could cannabis have helped Kyle Rittenhouse not commit the murders he did? Cannabis has been proven to calm nerves and curb violent tendencies in users.

Things we do know about Kyle and what has been revealed to date:

Kyle Rittenhouse Video

The Kyle Rittenhouse shooting video shows events that most believe is hard to fathom resulted in a not guilty verdict. The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is one of the ages that stirred the souls of millions of Americans both who believed he should be guilty of murder, and those who did not.

The Kyle Rittenhouse footage shows him shooting and acting like a police officer in the streets in an above the law manner. Check out the Kyle Rittenhouse full video to make up your own mind.

Kyle Rittenhouse Charges

How exactly were Kyle Rittenhouse charges dropped?

The end result of this event led to Kyle Rittenhouse charges being dropped on all counts of murder. Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted on all charges in the fatal shooting of two men and wounding of a third during a night of protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020.

Kyle Rittenhouse had a legal team that claimed it was self defense. Kyle Rittenhouse attorney, Mark Richards was the man who placed enough doubt in the jurors to let this 17 year old murderer walk free. Mark Richards was the Kyle Rittenhouse lawyer that proved reasonable doubt even in the most obvious charges.

These were the Kyle Rittenhouse charges that were all amazingly dropped.

COUNT 1: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESS HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

COUNT 2: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

COUNT 3: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

COUNT 4: FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

COUNT 5: ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

COUNT 6: POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18

In such a clear case where the facts show that Kyle was guilty of most of not all of these crimes somehow with a strong legal defense he walked away and escaped a deserved life behind bars.

The last charge, count 6, is a slam-dunk guilty that he got away with as well! Rittenhouse was armed with an AR-style semi-automatic rifle and was 17 years old on the night of the shootings.

Wisconsin law prohibits minors from possessing firearms except for hunting or when supervised by an adult in target practice or instruction in the proper use of a dangerous weapon. Rittenhouse’s attorneys argued another subsection of the law, regarding short-barreled rifles, and ended up getting that count dropped as well! This is a complete joke and slap in the face of the victims family's and even the law in Wisconsin.

It is a mockery of the Wisconsin gun law. The Kyle Rittenhouse shooting should have resulted in a murder verdict and most certainly a possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

How is an AR-15 not a “dangerous weapon?”

Something is very wrong with the law if an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle is considered to be not a dangerous weapon.

We all know he was 17 and shot people to death with an AR-style semi automatic rifle.

Yes he got away with all charges? Even possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under the age of 18?

Doesn't this concern you as a US citizen that the law can be interpreted this way with the help of an expensive legal defense team?

Was Kyle Rittenhouse drunk when he killed two men that night?

The police should have immediately tested Rittenhouse's blood/alcohol level since alcohol often contributes to an increase in aggressive behavior and a decrease in judgement. It will forever be unknown if alcohol played a part in the murders but many believe it likely did.

Kyle Rittenhouse Gofundme

Did you know Kyle Rittenhouse had a gofundme page? Rittenhouse wants the world to help him pay for his legal fees. The Kyle Rittenhouse fundraiser is a sore subject for many who feel he is not deserving of any sympathy nor funds after fatally killing two men.

Who is Kyle Rittenhouse?

On August 25, 2020, Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17-year-old, fatally shot two men and wounded another in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The shootings occurred during the protests and riots that followed the non-fatal shooting of an African American man, Jacob Blake, by a white police officer.

Kyle Rittenhouse is a murderer who is a free man, walking the streets, in fact, gaining fame and fortune from the atrocious acts he committed. Kyle Rittenhouse age was 17 at the time of the shootings, not 18 as some are saying on social media.

Where is Kyle Rittenhouse From?

Kyle Rittenhouse is from Antioch, Illinois.

Who Were The Kyle Rittenhouse Victims

Who did Kyle Rittenhouse shoot? Who were the victims of Kyle Rittenhouse? How many people did Kyle Rittenhouse kill?

Kyle Rittenhouse killed two men and injured another.

The Kyle Rittenhouse shooting victims were:

1. Joseph Rosenbaum

Joseph Rosenbaum was the first person Rittenhouse shot on this crazy night. Rosenbaum had just been discharged from a hospital in Milwaukee.

The 36-year-old came into near contact with Rittenhouse in a used-car lot. Rittenhouse aimed his an AR-15-style rifle at Rosenbaum to let him know not to mess with him. Rosenbaum was unarmed, carrying only a plastic bag with some socks, toothbrush, toothpaste, deodorant and some papers inside it.

Rittenhouse's lawyers claim that Kyle was threatened by this unarmed man when a paper bag was thrown at him. Rittenhouse then shot and killed Rosenbaum and fled the scene after.

2. Anthony Huber

Anthony Huber is from Silver Lake, Kenosha, Wisconsin. He  was one of the men fatally shot by Kyle H. Rittenhouse on August 25th, 2020.

Both Huber and Rittenhouse were in the same Black Lives Matter demonstration that took place that evening.

Rittenhouse was a 17-year old with an AR-15 semi automatic rifle claiming that he wanted to protect businesses from vandalism. Police alarmingly allowed this to take place which is hard to believe is not wrongful on their part.

Huber was at the event demanding justice for Jacob Blake who was shot by Kenosha Police Department officer Rusten Sheskey on August 23rd, 2020.

Huber did not have a weapon. He was killed by Rittenhouse because he swung at Rittenhouse with a skateboard trying to unarm him since he knew that Rittenhouse had just shot a man minutes earlier. The defense attorneys for Rittenhouse argued that their client was in grave danger from this skateboard yielding man and his shooting of Huber was justifiable.

3. Gaige Grosskreutz 

Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, is a trained medic who had provided aid at around 75 protests prior to this event on August 25th, 2020. Grosskreutz admitted to pointing a pistol at Rittenhouse after hearing gun shots and fearing for his life. Rittenhouse then opened fire with his machine gun, injuring Grosskreutz but not killing him as he did the other 2 victims.

When asked by a Wisconsin court if he was trying to kill Rittenhouse, Grosskreutz said, “that’s not the kind of person that I am. It’s not why I was out there for 75 days prior to that, why I spent up until that point my time, my money, my education providing care for people.” “It’s not who I am and definitely not somebody that I would want to become,” he added.

Kyle Rittenhouse Criminal Record

Did Kyle Rittenhouse have a criminal record prior to this event?

The court access website in Illinois shows three case numbers for Kyle Howard Rittenhouse, who is 17 years old, in Kenosha County.

All three files state, “case has not been concluded. Unless a judgment of conviction is entered, the defendant is presumed innocent of all charges.”

So we know that Rittenhouse had had multiple issues with the law, but again the conviction was dropped for whatever reasons. 3 times before the age of 18, so we know that this kid has had issues with the law on multiple occasions prior to killing these two men.

Who is Kyle Rittenhouse Mother?

Wendy Rittenhouse is a certified nursing assistant and a single mother to three children, Faith, 21, Kyle, 18, and McKenzie, 17. Kyle Rittenhouse parents are Wendy Rittenhouse and Mike Rittenhouse, a former machine worker with a history of alcohol and drug abuse issues.

Where is Kyle Rittenhouse Now?

Is Kyle Rittenhouse in jail? Surprisingly the answer to that is no, he is not in jail. Rittenhouse has been using this incident to his advantage, doing interviews on major news channels and trying to cash in on his sudden popularity. Rittenhouse spoke to Tucker Carlson on Fox News.

It should be noted the victims in this case did each have a criminal history. But, regardless, is it ok for a 17-year old non-government employee, non-Police Officer, to roam the streets with an AR-15 and shoot and kill people? No matter what was going on, should citizens be able to perform such acts? Or should they stay the responsibility of our police officers and government instead?

If 17 year olds are allowed to carry Ar-15 semi automatic rifles and shoot citizens to death does that concern you at all about the safety of where you live?

Could Cannabis Have Stopped Kyle Rittenhouse From Killing Two Men?

According to a recent study by the Research Center of the Institute Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada based on a review of animal studies it has been generally found that studies using smaller doses of THC/cannabis have been less likely to report the emergence of aggression, whereas studies using higher doses and more chronic exposure have rather led to an increase in aggressiveness.

Cannabis use is certainly safer than alcohol and has been linked in far fewer violent crimes.

What do you think? Could cannabis have helped chill Rittenhouse out and perhaps stopped the violence from getting out of hand as it did?

Kyle Rittenhouse Murder Overview

Kyle Rittenhouse is a young man from Illinois who shot and killed two people and injured another during demonstrations in Kenosha, Wisconsin. As a result of his actions, he has become a controversial figure in the country. The shooting of Jacob Blake, a black man who was left paralyzed after being shot multiple times in the back by a police officer, was the spark that ignited the protests. Blake was shot by the officer.

On August 25, 2020, Rittenhouse traveled to Kenosha while carrying a rifle with him. Once there, he joined a group of armed men who were patrolling the streets during the protests and became one of their number. Rittenhouse allegedly shot and killed two protesters, Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, and injured another, Gaige Grosskreutz, during an altercation with other protesters at some point in time.

Following that, Rittenhouse was taken into custody and charged with multiple counts, the most serious of which are first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, and attempted first-degree intentional homicide. He has entered a not guilty plea to all of the charges against him.

The case has been the subject of intense debate and has captured the attention of the media on a global scale. A great number of people have expressed their opinions regarding the events that took place and the question of whether or not Rittenhouse acted in self-defense. The case is still being heard, and a decision has not been made about what will happen next.

The shooting incident that involved Kyle Rittenhouse sparked intense debate and controversy across the United States, with a large number of people taking a variety of different stances on the case. Others have condemned Rittenhouse's behavior and demanded that justice be served for those who were hurt as a result of it, while others have argued that he was acting in self-defense and had the legal right to carry a weapon during the demonstrations in order to protect himself and his property.

The incident brought up additional concerns regarding the participation of armed individuals in demonstrations as well as the application of deadly force in the course of self-defense. This case brought to light the tensions and divisions that exist within American society with regard to issues of race, the right to bear arms, and excessive force by police.

The trial of Rittenhouse started in November 2021 and continued for a good number of weeks. Both the prosecution and the defense had the opportunity to present their arguments, and it was up to the jury to decide whether Rittenhouse had acted in self-defense or whether he was guilty of the charges that were brought against him.

On November 19, 2021, the jury came to the conclusion that Rittenhouse was not guilty of any of the charges brought against him, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, and attempted first-degree intentional homicide.

The verdict was met with both jubilation and outrage, with some people praising the decision as a victory for self-defense rights and others criticizing it as a miscarriage of justice and a sign of systemic racism in the criminal justice system. The celebrations and outrage were in response to the fact that the verdict acquitted the defendant of all charges.

The shooting incident that involved Kyle Rittenhouse and the subsequent trial were highly contentious and divisive, highlighting the complicated and ongoing debates surrounding issues of gun rights, self-defense, and racial justice in the United States of America.

Following the delivery of the verdict, there were numerous calls for introspection regarding the chain of events that culminated in Rittenhouse's behavior as well as the broader societal issues that were illuminated by the incident. In order to address issues of racial inequality and police brutality, many people have called for a renewed focus on nonviolent protest and dialogue as a means of addressing these problems.

The incident brought to light the need for more stringent laws regarding the possession of firearms and their use in public places. It also highlighted the need for better regulation of firearms. The participation of armed individuals at demonstrations, as was pointed out by a number of commentators, serves only to inflame the situation and raises the possibility of violent conflict.

The case also brought up concerns regarding the function of the media and the influence of social media on how the general public understands recent events. The incident received extensive coverage from the media, with some outlets characterizing it as an act of self-defense while others portrayed it as an assault motivated by racism. The case has also received a significant amount of attention on social media, where a large number of users have voiced their opinions on the topic while emphasizing the importance of the topic to a large audience.

The shooting that took place involving Kyle Rittenhouse and the subsequent trial were both significant events in the ongoing debates that are taking place in the United States regarding issues of gun rights, self-defense, and racial justice. The case brought to light the complexities and divisions that exist within American society, and it emphasized the importance of maintaining dialogue and taking action to address these issues.

The Rittenhouse case brought up concerns about the role of vigilantism and the use of lethal force by civilians in situations that would traditionally be handled by law enforcement. These concerns were raised in addition to the societal issues that were brought up by the case.

It was argued by some detractors that Rittenhouse, as an armed civilian, should not have been involved in patrolling the streets during the demonstrations, and that his actions amounted to vigilantism. Others stated that Rittenhouse's involvement was inappropriate. Others pointed out to him that his use of deadly force was excessive and unnecessary, and that he had other options available to him, such as retreating or asking for assistance from law enforcement. They said that he could have done either of those things.

The case brought to light the significance of following due process and the function played by the criminal justice system in determining whether or not an individual is guilty. People from all over the country paid close attention to the trial, and the verdict was interpreted by some as a validation of the idea that an individual should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

However, the case also raised concerns about the influence of public opinion on legal proceedings. Specifically, some commentators suggested that the outcome of the trial was influenced by the intense media coverage and public debate that surrounded the case. This caused the case to raise concerns about the influence of public opinion on legal proceedings.

The Rittenhouse case was a complicated and highly contentious event that brought to light a variety of issues relating to gun rights, the right to self-defense, racial justice, vigilantism, due process, and the role of the media in influencing public opinion. Even though the trial is over, the debates and conversations that it sparked are likely to continue for a considerable amount of time in the future.

The Rittenhouse scandal had repercussions not only for the local community but also for the larger political environment in the United States. The event that took place and the trial that followed were both heavily politicized, with numerous politicians and pundits from both political parties offering their opinions on the matter.

Some liberal politicians and media outlets characterized Rittenhouse as a white supremacist and a domestic terrorist, while some conservative politicians and media outlets portrayed Rittenhouse as a hero and a defender of law and order.

The case also brought up questions regarding the function of the Second Amendment in today's society as well as the boundaries of the concept of self-defense as a justification for the employment of deadly force.

Some people saw the verdict of the trial as a victory for gun rights advocates and a signal that armed civilians have the right to use deadly force in certain circumstances. This view was supported by the fact that the trial result was interpreted as a signal. Others interpreted the verdict as evidence of a dysfunctional criminal justice system and an inability to hold individuals accountable for acts of violence they committed.

In conclusion, the Rittenhouse case was an extremely divisive and contentious event that brought up a wide variety of difficult and debatable topics. In the upcoming months and years, the trial and verdict will continue to be discussed and analyzed, and it is likely that the case will have long-lasting implications for issues pertaining to gun rights, the right to self-defense, and the function of vigilantism in American society.